It was said that young painters in Paris in the early part of the 20th century were scared shitless of impromtu visits by Pablo Picasso. Picasso’s uncanny ability to synthesize artistic ideas allowed him to casually pluck the germ of an idea from a young artist and develop it into a whole new style before the young artist’s career had barely got started. Picasso’s ability to straddle styles was considered peerless in the history of art. Except there is one other who can wrestle that title from Picasso. He is the Chinese painter Zhang Daqian.
Like Picasso, Zhang was acclaimed universally for his virtuoso adaptability, ably flitting from style to style. And like Picasso, he was as much showman as dedicated artisan. He cultivated the classical chinese image of the great painter, “he had a convincing and compelling beard that, the story goes, helped him get a lot of his art collection through customs.” recalls Berkeley emeritus professor James Cahill [1]. But Zhang improves on Picasso in one particular way – not only was he the greatest painter of his generation, but he was also the greatest forger of his generation.

|
|
Zhang hated the Communists, leaving China in 1949 and never stepping back onto his homeland. He lived in Brazil and California, before finally settling in Taipei, where he passed away at the age of 83 in 1983. Travelling around the world as the greatest Chinese painter of his generation, he represented a lost generation of chinese painters, as culture in China spasmed under the communists.
Given the evolution of his later paintings, some consider Zhang as a bridge between East and West. In a famous meeting in Paris in 1956, between Zhang Daqian and Pablo Picasso, the two exemplars of the Chinese and European traditions, Picasso allegedly showed Zhang some drawings that he had done in the “Chinese” style. Zhang dryly remarked that they were not executed with the right tools. The quantity of ego at that meeting must have been explosive.
|
|
I was moved by Zhang’s later works where for all intents and purposes, he had achieved a powerful synthesis of abstract expressionism and chinese painting. There has always been a latent abstraction in chinese painting especially in the art of calligraphy – giving form to the abstraction of writing. Whilst abstract expressionism in the west was the reaction against the intrusion of photography into the european style of neoclassical realism, chinese art never suffered the upheaval from an unhealthy dose of realism. Certainly, Zhang claimed that he was not influenced by Western painting but given a lifetime of copying, assimilation and dissimulation, of course he would say that.
Indeed, the issue of authenticity poses one big cipher in the works of Zhang. Although many American museums were embarassed by the possibility that they had been duped by Zhang, his stature has risen so much that some museums are now exhibiting his fakes as works of Zhang, allowing the stench of forgery to be drowned out by the sweet cologne of postmodernism. Fakeness eventually becomes its own authenticity. Picasso would have wished that he had done that too.
[1]: Boston globe article
[2]: for a sanitized but detailed account of Zhang Daqian: Macao Museum
I’m surprised that more people aren’t anti-Picasso.
“Picasso’s uncanny ability to synthesize artistic ideas allowed him to casually pluck the germ of an idea from a young artist and develop it into a whole new style before the young artist’s career had barely got started.”
A generous way of saying that he stole people’s art. I find it appalling that he is arguably the most famous modern european painter, yet it is well known that he openly stole from other artists. He also directly denied that he stole a lot of African art (see http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1512804/Picasso-stole-the-work-of-African-artists.html for starters), from which cubism is plainly derived (see paragraphs 26-28 of this essay by Chinua Achebe http://www.cis.vt.edu/modernworld/d/Achebe.html here.)
“In a famous meeting in Paris in 1956, between Zhang Daqian and Pablo Picasso, the two exemplars of the Chinese and European traditions, Picasso allegedly showed Zhang some drawings that he had done in the “Chinese” style. Zhang dryly remarked that they were not executed with the right tools.”
This caused me to smile hugely.
